The Immortality of Garrick

The Immortality of Garrick
David Garrick, the eighteenth-century actor, playwright, and theater manager often credited with Shakespeare's 18th-century revival, is here lauded by a group of 17 actors in their favorite Shakespearean characters, as he is carried to his apotheosis

Thursday, May 10, 2012

POEMS OF A STARVING PLAYWRIGHT: METATHEATRICAL METAPHORICAL MUSINGS


PROLOGUE
TO
HAMLET
To change, or not to change – that is the question:
Whether ‘tis more impressive in the community to adapt
The works and plays of original masterminds
Or to take risks against a sea of Critics
And by creating something new end them.  To be, to dream –
No more – and by a dream to say we write
The new, and the thousand inspirational muses
That the heart is slave to.  ‘Tis applause
Secretly to be wished.  To be, to dream –
To dream – perchance to express: ay, there’s the rub,
For in that creation of expression what words may come
When we have changed what was known,
Must give us pause.  There’s the fear
That makes writer’s block of so long a struggle.
For who would face the abuses and offenses of criticism,
-Touch immortal Shakespeare or try his amateur hand-
Th’ audience’s booing, the critics’ comparisons
The disappointment of rejected writing, and the judgment
That indoctrinated society of th’ amateurs believes,
When they themselves might his play enjoy
With a distinguished signature?  Who would criticism undergo,
To be shamed and ridiculed under a futile attempt,
But that the dread of rejection after production,
The spontaneous expression, from whose bravery
No writer ignores, conjectures the controversy,
And makes us rather worship those works we recognize
Than acknowledge others that we know not of?
Thus celebrity worship does make cowards of us all,
And thus the bold face of creation
Is tided o’er with the natural comfort of stagnation,
And belief in tradition and legacy
With this respect the writers cease writing
And lose the name of artist.

An excerpt from METATHEATRICAL METAPHORICAL MUSINGS
The theater, the midnight sky
plays inspired by constellations and shooting stars,
galaxies and the Big Dipper.
The actors, the fireworks and night lights
so much practice and preparation
in anticipation of the big showing, the night to shine.
Waiting for the cue of the director
to perform their parts,
each explosion of sound and light more forgettable and unremarkable than the next.
Each actor’s dramatic soliloquy
an infinitesimal moment to make a lasting impression.
A self-sacrificing act, it ultimately ends in silence – nothing.

Monday, May 7, 2012

Analyzing Hamlet



        I want to write a bit more about Hamlet, since I feel as though I have somewhat ignored this play in comparison to the others. More particularly, I want to take a closer look at Hamlet’s relationship with the main or key female figures of the play, the Queen of Denmark (Gertrude) and Polonius’s daughter, Ophelia.

       At the start of the play, the Ghost presents Hamlet with the information that his mother has married his father's murderer (his father's own brother). This information provides an internal conflict for Hamlet, as he sees his mother from both the loving son and the loving husband’s point of view (since he carries out his father’s reaction), in addition to seeing her as a betrayer. In other words, Hamlet sees his mother as both a loved and loathed woman that resides inside one body; her quick marriage to his uncle obviously fuels this loathing for her. Just as he cannot separate his mother from Ophelia, he is unable to separate the mother he loves from the mother he loathes.

       What's interesting is to analyze Hamlet's actions and treatment towards women throughout the play. For instance, it appears that Hamlet is unable to separate Ophelia from his mother (the Queen). In the play, he accuses Ophelia of possessing the same treacherous nature as his mother. This sense of blame and rejection seemingly comes from the simple fact that she’s female. Not only is he disappointed in his mother for quickly marrying his father’s killer, he denies Ophelia—a woman he once claimed to love. His denial of her truth reminds me of Lear’s rejection of Cordelia’s honesty and Leontes’ denial of Hermione’s innocence (her transparent language). In general, we have seen, throughout Shakespeare’s plays (and through the words of these men), the major male leads’ distrust of women. On the mythic plane, Hamlet ultimately destroys Ophelia as he desperately attempts, in the real plane/realm, to sever his ties to her. Furthermore, the Ghost’s information has seemingly driven a type of madness in Hamlet. Eventually, he sees his beloved mother as actually a remorseless Queen, and comes to view Ophelia in a similar light. This madness is also induced by his need to kill the new king, his uncle (King Claudius). At various times in the play, Hamlet seems to contemplate his own death and even suicide. And unfortunately for Cordelia, her madness seems to spur out of Hamlet’s mistreatment of her.

       Unlike Hamlet’s end, Cordelia’s death seems to be that of suicide. Ophelia herself seems to represent human frailty. Her cut and wilting flowers symbolize her helplessness (all of which is conveyed through song, seen drowning around her, or placed on her grave). Similar to King Lear, what we have in this tragedy is the idea of human cost—the currency of what the heart is forced to pay. Overall, it’s interesting to see how lies, mistrust, and doubt, operate within Shakespeare’s plays, in addition to what these things say about humanity (or how they elevate or tear down humanity). 

Final Project - Story for Mamillius



Friday, May 4, 2012

Final Project--To Poetically re-imagine Shakespeare plays and particular scenes.


Thorned King
Through entangled crowned hairs and blazing light
Through a thousand hells
He led her to her endless plight,
or so the story tells.

A flattered public display he preferred
Over Cordelia’s ‘nothing’ so pure
Abandoning the truth that she lent
To fire, it he sent.

But for a demand speech of reassurance, the price is great,
Soon they’d prick and thorn his life to darken his days
For loving the unloving delivers an unfortunate state
And after the battle, in the ground they lay
remembering nothing…

Life, for him, the price of momentary fame,
Brought fractured hearts to what was just a double-talk game

Eventually, he recalled what he forgot
But still more evil came, more pain wrought.
All the good he once sought,
All his work came to not.  

At the end, he looked at her lips, asking to deliver something so vibrant
Never recalling that she said to “Love, and be silent.”

Author’s Note: I attempted to transform particular plays and scenes into poems. The theme for this poem is that love makes no speaking sound. This poem serves to encapsulate the story of King Lear, emphasizing the consequences of his love test. For some of my poems, I included a few images in order to help with this mental visualization. 
 ------



Unmade
Similar to the smell of water,
She is nature rather than art
And is weathered silent on this frozen ground
but still dazzles you so.
Something born, made, recreated?
As something that arrived too late for words
It moves you slowly toward the gray, cloudy footage that memory preserves
Echoing now as a confusing imitation

Within this stone
There is something brilliant suffused inside
The gaze is still
But there is no place she does not see you.
Like a fantasy that plays upon our sight
Seducing you at every moment
Tricking your focused eye
A work trapped in the almost,
Looking for movement and for words

If squeezed hard enough,
she will emerge like a pit from a dried up plum
still audible to you.

A burst, a shatter
A cracking of that outer crust of rock
Breaking the heavy fossil layers that borders
A deeper heartbeat repeating, move, move
Following the music of her conductor,
Senses now replacing the empty air
Words fluent on her lips.

Author’s Note: In this poem I attempt to re-imagine the scene of Hermione’s statue (how the statue serves to suspend our disbelief), while at the same time positioning her character as it relates to her husband, King Leontes. The statue serves to puzzle us, and I try to capture this unsure/ambiguous moment from both the character’s perspective (Leontes) and the audience’s (Is she moving or not? Has she been living this whole time or restored/resurrected? How is this statue tricking our senses?).  The poem also focuses on how language (language as it relates to knowledge and being “real” or human) or oral exchange is an important theme in the play. Moreover, in this poem, I attempt to recreate the scene of when she’s attempting to come back to life. At the end of the poem, she is a “nature’s art” realized.
-----



The Storyteller

On a wintery night outside of time,
Sitting like two innocent lovers
Upstairs, the boy begins a paper-filled sad tale
Next to the rain-stained window

He tenderly steals his mother’s warmth
encircling them are envious crickets
wishing to hear about the man dwelling in a churchyard,
wanting to be frightened by fantastical sprites.

On his mother’s lap he intently whispers to her
all of the best secrets to a winter’s tale
but the fantasy of whispering will overwhelm
a suspicious husband, a jealous king

Giving in to the mind's flat-noted chorus and
with a center long iced over
He rips them like a paper in two

The boy did not complete the season,
his story of ripe bitter melons and green caterpillars
resting underneath the leaves
of pearl pumping seas
of a love discovered
was a story untold, unsatisfied.


But perhaps it’s an unscheduled tale that breathes in the absence of words,
is restored, surviving in the nameless space that is our imagination
The fresh unknown stopping to let us board
Inviting us to toss whatever we have in our minds' pockets
Just a patch of frozen water,
waiting to melt.

Will the story be to find what is missing?

Author’s Note: In this poem, I attempt to create the scene of Mamillius and his mother in The Winter’s Tale. In short, I attempt to show how the act of whispering, in addition to the visual or theatrical display of heartful bodies touching, may upset (or trigger) a jealous husband. Furthermore, the main point of this poem is to think back to how Shakespeare uses absence or offstage events. Ultimately, what this poem is saying (even though I shouldn’t say it myself as it undermines my poem’s point) is that it’s better to let the audience imagine the story themselves---to fill in the blanks all on their own (a story found). I added details to the story by including caterpillars, bitter melons, and so forth, to hint at how my mind would re-imagine Mamillius’ story. Overall, I also hope that readers’ begin asking themselves, “Is what’s sad about Mamillius’ story lies in the fact that he never got to finish it?” 

Jessica's Final Project

Ophelia's Death: Suicide or Homicide?



Gerri's Final Project


Michelle Dinh's Final Project

Here's the first four pages from my children's fairy tale version of King Lear. Sorry I could not include the pictures.
 
Page 1
Once upon a time there was a kingdom of magical fruits under the rule of King Pear. King Pear was getting old and he wanted to retire. King Pear had to divide his land into three because he had three daughters. King Pear did not know how much he should give each of his daughters, so he made up a test for them. They each had to tell him how much they love him. The more love they show, the more land they will get.

Page 2
King Pear called his oldest daughter, Princess Grapefruit to speak first.
            “Your Majesty, my love for you is deeper than the chocolate ground and higher than the cotton candy sky,” said Princess Grapefruit.
            “That’s very smart, Princess Grapefruit. I will give you everything from the left edge of the kingdom to the mint forest,” said King Pear.
Princess Grapefruit hurried to tell her husband, Prince Watermelon her good news.

Page 3
Then King Pear called his second daughter, Princess Orange to speak next.
            “Father, I love you more than peanut butter loves jelly and strawberry loves banana,” said Princess Orange.
“That’s very sweet, Princess Orange. I will give you everything from the right edge of the kingdom to the lemonade river.
Princess Orange rushed off to tell her husband, Prince Apple her good news.

Page 4
Finally King Pear called his youngest daughter and his favorite, Princess Tangerine to speak.
            “Daddy, I have nothing to say,” said Princess Tangerine.
            “How can you have nothing to say? If you don’t say anything you will get nothing,” said King Pear.
            “I cannot compare my love to anything like my sisters did,” said Princess Tangerine.
            “I was going to give you everything in between the mint forest and the lemonade river,” said King Pear.
            “I know I love you. I love you as any girl loves her daddy. When I get married I will still love you, but I will also love Prince Mango just as much,” said Princess Tangerine.
            “No, that is not good enough! You will get nothing. Go marry Prince Mango and leave the kingdom,” said King Pear.
            “Yes, sir,” said Princess Tangerine.
            “Your Highness, you should not do this,” said Cherry, the court jester.
            “Be quiet or I will banish you too!” said King Pear.